Pre-Meeting of board
- We have Basketball scheduling problems. We need to start the weekend before
Thanksgiving, or the games will be scheduled into March, when gyms are are already blocked out for tournaments. Bob has not been able to personally
speak with Scott Weyda, and Keith will speak
with him on Thursday to see if we can get a waiver for both the boys and
girls teams.
- Discussion of ref fees. Will stay at $19 this year.
- Discussion of gym fees, maximum. According to league bylaws, it was
decided to keep at $1.50 for adult, $1.00 for HS and Seniors,
and 50 cents for grade school. This
was reviewed last year following a poll of members.
- Basketball per team fees will go from $250 to $260
per team.
- St. Matthew applied for admission. Will add about 7 or 8 teams. Bob had some concern because we already admitted
two new schools without gyms, and we have a gym time shortage already.
They have no problem with team travel.
It was decided to admit them for BB
General BB meeting followed at 7pm
- Announced new BB per team fee of $260.
- Team commitments and checks for teams are due with
Bob Roloff on September 30. He starts scheduling the next day.
- Explained the calendar. Will not play between Christmas and New
Year. Will request exemption to
start week before Thanksgiving.
Wants to avoid going into March. We have previously finished in Mid
February.
- Basketball rules for Parkview have not changed.
- Team rosters are due November 16.
- Need coach contact sheets completed, so that if games
are moved or cancelled, we have a contact.
- Any special requests, for instance, for scheduling of
games to avoid something like a school play, or for a team to move up a
division, should be in writing or by email to Bob Roloff
on or before September 30
- Discussion of parent/coach/player misconduct,
especially with regard to getting on refs. One or two game suspensions
were leveled in the past for violations. That will continue into the
future.
- Discussion and vote to change game start times to 9,
10, 11, 12:30, 1:30 and 2:30. Most games are under an hour, and this
does allow some catch up time if a game runs over. Vote was almost unanimous to change.
- Discussion of Clinics. When and where. Handouts provided.
- Discussion of dual participation rule. In preparation for archdiocese advisory
board meeting where a petition to change the rule will be considered. The large schools seemed to strongly
support the current rule, while the smaller ones had some concerns with
continued enforcement of this rule destroying their program.
- Summary of argument from the larger schools: This
is really about the club team players. Not the recreation league players, but
the club players. And this is a small percentage of the school
players. The club teams play many
more games and tournaments than any archdiocesan teams, and we cannot
compete with the club teams for some of these players with our 12 game
schedules. Many of their tournaments take place weekends, when our games
take place. There will be schedule conflicts that will inevitably result
in the players selecting the club team over a school team. Parents pay a
lot of money for the Club teams, and those teams generally prohibit players
from missing games, or they are cut from the team. The result will be that the Parkview
teams will be missing these players for some of the games, with potential
forfeits, and to make matters worse, these club players may have taken an
"A" team spot from some other child who shows up for every
game. The schools would need to
take these club team students knowing in advance that they will be
missing practices and games, and create player shortages for practices
and games. The larger schools seemed to strongly object to changing the
rules.
- From some of the smaller schools: These kids don't
find the limited archdiocesan schedule challenging enough, and we are
losing a lot of players to the club teams. This has especially hurt the soccer
league, where enforcement of the dual participation rule was described as
lax until last year. Now, many
players have abandoned the school teams, to the point where there are not
enough players to field a team.
Additionally, it is a parental decision whether two teams is too
much. And, there is no rule
prohibiting a child from playing sports seven days a week, as long as
there are different sports. If the
rule was really addressing a problem of too many sports, why is this
allowed?
- On a hand vote, it was noted that the number of
people wanting to keep the rule slightly outnumbered the people wanting
the change, but the number was close.
The split appeared, in this writer's view, to be along school size
lines.